Skip to main content

Climate Change: Why do we ignore the Science?

Last year I signed up for a short environmental psychology class with Jeffrey Kiehl. We looked at WHY the science is so easy to ignore. Professor Kiehl has a book called Facing Climate Change - I haven’t read it, but I learned a lot in class. 

The last few centuries of progress have been shaped by the idea that nature is separate from us, inferior to us (as we’ve moved away from seeing Spirit in nature), and that it can be tamed and exploited. The Age of Reason led to humans thinking of ourselves as superior because the intellect was deemed superior.  


The scientific community identified fossil fuels as a problem almost 140 years ago! But their warnings fall on deaf ears. In class, professor Kiehl explained that data doesn’t lead to action because the parts of the brain that are involved in decision making and resolution are emotional, not rational. Decisions involve the Limbic System - in one case, a person’s amydgala is activated (a fearful trauma response) which happens if they are scared of losing security or being threatened. Others are aligned with action, empathy and problem solving; the "anterior cingulate cortex" is activated in this group's brain. 

Those who fall into the second neurological response tend to be community-focused rather than individualistic, which makes the prospect of solving a crisis less daunting. They are more likely to do something about climate change, and to feel connected to others and to nature. Less overwhelm. 

Denial + inaction are linked to the fear response. Professor Kiehl points to storytelling and archetypes as a vital tool in climate action.

It's what makes us connect with and care about the planet. I’m sharing this now because I watched Don’t Look Up. Loved the movie, but it focuses on alarm, and based on what we learned in class, we probably need to shift our awareness efforts away from alarm and facts, towards empathy and community building. It’s neuroscience. This is a taster of what we saw in class - just one concept in a class that lasted three weeks. Check out Kiehl's website. 

Planting trees also helps a ton by bringing down temperature levels 🌤️

We can do it together 🌴🌴🌴

Reiki hugs, 

Regina

ps... This class made me see more of a benefit to mythology. Even if we don't believe in spirituality, astrology, metaphors, it's still useful when it comes to dealing with issues, and moving us to action. Empathy, emotion and logic are all necessary. 


FYI - I am an energy healer, not a psychologist. 


*** 


Regina Chouza is an energy healer, astrologer and author of A Personal Guide to Self-Healing, Cancer & Love and Chakra Healing & Magick. She holds a BA in Philosophy and an MBA (Master in Business Administration)- focusing on ethics, finance and leadership. Regina’s passion is bringing self-love, joy and empowerment to healing pursuits.


image: canva. com

Popular posts from this blog

Does sharing have to be selfless or painful?

One of the things that I have had to let go of is the idea that if we help someone, it has to be 100% altruistic - in order for the action to be good. I don’t know if this is an idea that I adopted in childhood seeing others hold up selflessness as good - “give till it hurts” etc. The world would be a much better place if we knew that it is always in our benefit to help others. We always get something in return, directly or indirectly 💛 🫶🏻 Research shows that kindness makes for a much healthier society. I read a book last year called Shadow, Self & Spirit on transpersonal (or collective) psychology. There was a chapter on the psychology of evil and violence. People are less likely to harm others if they experience some form of compassion in their lives, or if they believe that someone cares about them - even if it’s a public figure, a politician, a celeb, or a deity like Quan Yin. Or better yet, family members, friends, and strangers. Random acts of kin...

Looking into a Reiki Meta-Analysis (Clinical Study)

A few days ago, I came across a Reiki meta-analysis that was published last year. A meta analysis is a very large study that compiles other studies, in this case randomized controlled trials, and aggregates all of their data. As I have mentioned before, one of the challenging things about holistic studies, and clinical studies in general, is making sure that they accurately measure what they intend to measure. Note: I may come back to this in the future to keep refining information and thoughts, and to simplify it.  In the meantime, my first impressions :  Effects of Reiki therapy on quality of life: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.   Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 27;14(1):72.    The participants in these studies were cancer patients, surgical patients and people with chronic issues (including high stress) who were not hospitalized. There weren't enough people in those study groups to generate reliable statistics for cancer vs surgery, but when all of them...

Vibrational Medicine by Dr Richard Gerber (Book Review)

People often ask if energy healing depends on the belief of the client - the placebo effect is real .  And while we   can  harness it by working through feelings and beliefs  that may undermine the healing process,   when I worked in  consumer  healthcare, research was  expected to outperform the placebo.   This is why I was happy to find a  book called  Vibrational Medicine,  by Dr Richard Gerber. It goes  through research done in labs and clinical settings. The book is a brick: 500 pages and almost too technical, but worth reading as an energy healer.   Below you will find highlights from Chapter 8 on Psychic Healing. Please note ,  Energy Healing is complementary to medical care, not alternative.   Dr. Gerber uses the term  'Psychic Healing'  throughout the book; however, in my own practice, I refer to these concepts as  'Energy Healing' based on my studies . Vibrational Medicine, by Richar...